No matter the group, there’s always politicking and infighting.
People purportedly on the same page dick-swinging to elevate themselves in the hierarchy. We did it first, those guys don’t have the requisite credentials, only scientists can make valid arguments etc. and tosh like that.
What a crock of shite.
One doesn’t have to be a “scientist” to write critiques or to question what is being proclaimed as current established science - and let’s be honest - we’re talking about the fraud that has been perpetrated since the inception of vaccination (way back in the 1880’s), the fraud that was HIV, its bogus testing, the misuse of PCR, fraudulent infection stats based on those spurious non-specific “tests”, this paradigm then morphing into the later and greater fraud that was and is Covid. The stage was and remains set.
Investigative journalists like Celia Farber, Liam Scheff, John Lauritsen and others of their ilk, were instrumental in exposing these frauds and their associated social horrors as far back as the 80’s - none of them scientists but replete with sufficient intelligence to ask the right questions of the right people. Then you’ve got people like Robert F Kennedy Jr, a qualified environmental lawyer who also isn’t a scientist but can read the technical literature and recognise flaws and anomalies in the content sufficiently so to argue and win scientifically technical cases consistently. Albeit with expertise bolstering these arguments.
To date, the scientific establishment (NOT THE ESTABLISHED SCIENCE) continue to circle the wagons, protecting their narrow, unwavering narratives (such as the virology crap) and anyone daring to question the dogma (as it’s all faith based anyway) are ostracised, vilified, character-assassinated and their careers and reputations trashed just to protect the orthodoxy. Factuality and truth are irrelevant - the profiteering powermongering paradigm must be upheld. Anything that dissents is heresy.
So these in-house little debates that ensue are just spectacularly counterproductive - some would say they might all be initiated by controlled opposition, shills, trolls - call them what you will. Many of them aren’t even human - they’re bots programmed to latch onto certain words & phrases and then plunge the online debate into a pejorative ad-hominem mud-slinging contest.
The baby fucks off with the bath water. Job done.
To a case in point - the virology house of cards doesn’t need scientists to recognise its flaws but it may certainly need them to eventually convince the world of this folly. However, what’s at stake in the big pharma chemicalised allopathic medical model is so huge, it will be defended literally to the death.
Remember one thing - it was the scientists and the dogma of scientism that got us into this shit in the first place.
And so it goes.
Namaste, peeps.
Rock 2024 and never look back otherwise the monsters in the rear view mirrors will always be closer than you think…
2024 will be the year of either drivng forward, and fast, to escape the beasts in the mirror, and for the sheep, back into the stable and the slaughterhouse IMO