EVOLVING TO FIT IN AT ANY COST
Fear of not fitting in - the ultimate weapon of the propagandists
Vaccines have been one of the greatest and most successful achievements in the history of medicine.
Vaccines eradicated smallpox.
Vaccines eradicated polio.
Darwinism is an empirical scientific fact.
The problem with all of the above statements is that none of them are true yet they are universally, not only accepted, they are believed and defended to the core. They are established facts after all, aren’t they?
Well, actually, no. They’re not. They’re all fatally flawed and unsupported by science and the historical and archaeological records.
And anyone speaking out against any of the above is automatically and usually pejoratively, labeled an idiot, anti-science or, the favourite epithet - a conspiracy theorist, which is modern parlance for a gullible moron.
Propaganda, all of it.
Take vaccines for example - the statistical data (on record from government archives across the planet) demonstrate empirically that the diseases cited above were at statistically insignificant (almost immeasurable) levels of infection and mortality BEFORE its associated “vaccine” was introduced.
This is amply and clearly demonstrated in Suzanne Humphries’ book, Dissolving Illusions, herself a credentialed doctor who went down the rabbit hole decades ago when she saw her patients being adversely affected by vaccines yet when she raised these very obvious issues, she was vilified and shut down by her peers. Correlation isn’t causation after all - shut up and give the terminal cancer patient his next jab. But she couldn’t do it. It was so glaringly wrong. So she jumped ship, went back to university, studied a whole lot more and began to properly research vaccination, something that is NOT taught to students at medical school. That research supported her initial suspicions and then some - it proved unarguably that everything she and her fellow doctors had been told about vaccines and vaccination was pure propaganda and none of it was factually accurate. She proved that - at least the historical medical records did. She replicated them openly in the book. They speak for themselves.
Despite this, her colleagues ostracised her, put their fingers in their ears, circled the wagons, refused to do their own research, continued to administer these unnecessary poisons to their patients and ignored the exponential increase in chronic sickness in the heavily vaccinated population and the annoying fact that unvaccinated kids seemed so much healthier and had far fewer immune or allergy related ailments.
It must be said, however, vaccines alone are unlikely to be the sole cause of this pandemic (for that’s what it is truly is) - as RFK Jr had said so often, to paraphrase “…our kids are swimming in a toxic soup of chemicals with glyphosate and atrazine in our foods, mercury, aluminum and other dangerous ingredients in vaccines…” and it’s hard to disagree.
It took a large portion of the population in recent times, 3 years to realise that innate immune system protection against infection (toxicity - call it what you will) is so much better than the chemicals they said would protect you against this covid thing. Until it didn’t. But by then, they’d made their billions and the fallout will just be managed by the same system and medical model that caused the vaccine attrition in the first place at more obscene profiteering. Great business model though.
And they’re rumbling those war horns again as they try to subjugate the global population through international diktats bequeathing hegemonic power to the UN through the WHO where they propose to enforce global health “orders” on the population.
I trust enough of the people on the planet learned the hard lesson last time round and their bullshitometers are working much better than before. Like with the local VOICE “referendum” (sic) - saying NO is oftentimes the most empowering thing one can do. This is another of those times.
However, I digress.
Darwinism is similarly couched in irrefutable populism.
It’s become accepted as empirical science. Yet it’s not.
It remains a theory. And it’s a fatally flawed one.
As with so many ideological refutations, the Darwinists love to use religion as the foil with which they’ll bolster their own assertions using the logic that if we make the Creationists look stupid and debunk their argument then our position, by default, must be right and unassailable. Only it’s not and scientific rigour doesn’t work that way.
This isn’t a debate between biblical creation and evolution - it’s simply about a single question: has Darwin’s theory been proved by empirical scientific evidence?
And the simple answer is, no it has not.
The famous illustration showing the fish transforming into an amphibian and crawling out of the swamp then evolving from that to a small shrew-like mammal, then a small quadrupedal ape which ultimately evolves into a bipedal ape, then an obvious hominid until voila - at the end of the line there walks an anatomically modern human. We’ve all seen the drawing. But that doesn’t make it true. It just demonstrates the THEORY and what Darwinists think might have happened. But did it?
Darwinism, to this day, calls for a “missing link” yet there has never been one found. And that’s the least of the issues.
As far back as 1967 when world renowned anthropologist Louis B. Leakey was asked during a college lecture about “the missing link” he snorted and replied, “There is no ONE link missing - there are HUNDREDS of links missing.”
And that situation obtains to this day.
Then there’s the flowering plants problem. And that’s a doozie. According to Darwin there had to be a series of many transitional species. That’s the crux of the biscuit. But with hominids - they’re not there. With flowering plants - same story. As the late Harvard biologist Stephen Jay Gold asserted, “All palaeontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions between major groups are characteristically lacking.”
Even Darwin wrote that in the absence of transitional fossils, “It is the most serious objection that can be urged against the theory.”
Not much has changed.
Even if and when the scientists prove the Earth is likely to be at least four billion years old thereby blowing Creationism to smithereens, this still doesn’t prove that what Darwin proposes is the correct answer. It certainly doesn’t look that way when exposed to proper scientific rigour. But if we denounce the stupid religious Creationist nutters along with the conspiracy-theory whacked anti-vaxxers then this proves: a) vaccines work and are safe and effective and eradicate disease and b) evolution is a scientific fact.
Refer to opening statements - it’s all bollocks, folks and as with masks for viruses (like wearing a sock as a condom), the trans agenda (nothing to do with the actual trans community), the climate crisis (there isn’t one) - there’s a concerted effort, through the agencies of fear and intimidation and the relentless repetition of “groupthink” like with vaccination and Darwinism - these are taught - no, forced upon us as if they are the gospel and in some sense they are I guess as it takes pure blind faith to believe in something that has no basis in scientific empiricism as is the case with those two dogmas.
Don’t be afraid to question what the rest of society takes for granted because they’re too lazy or afraid to think for themselves.
That’s what the forces seeking to manipulate us, rely upon - our acquiescence and fear of rejection from the tribe.
People, if the tribe continues to blindly support this stuff then the tribe is fucked and you don’t want anything to do with them.
And that is no theory. That’s an unarguable reality.
Namaste folks. Peace